LivePress.com


Article Related:
Advice
Aging
Arts and Crafts
Automotive
Break-up
Business
Business Management
Cancer Survival
Career
Cheating
Classifieds
Computers and Technology
Cooking
Culture
Dating
Death
Education
Entertainment
Etiquette
Family Concerns
Finances
Food and Drinks
Gardening
Home Management
Humor
Internet
Jobs
Leadership
Legal
Marketing
Marriage
Medical Business
Medicines and Remedies
Opinions
Parenting
Pets
Poetry
Politics
Real Estate
Recreation
Relationships
Religion
Self Help
Sexuality
Short Stories
Society
Sports
Travel
Wellness, Fitness and Diet
Womens Interest
World Affairs
Writing

Ping Service
Article
Encyclopedia
Categories
Rss Center
Search
Affiliates
Contact Us

The Affirmative Action Debateby Kenny Du

Affirmative action is one of the most controversial political issues facing America. Most often, affirmative action assists disadvantaged groups by improving placement in higher education and employment, and the term is most often conceived as a program to improve the standing of African Americans. <BR><BR>People take different stances on the issue, supporting their opinions with various justifications, such as the need for equality and natural competition. Although it was created to help advance the position of disadvantaged peoples, some view affirmative action as an unfair, and even prejudicial, force in our society. <BR><BR>While the Johnson administration institutionalized affirmative action, the struggle for equality actually began a century earlier with the passage of important legislation. In the late 1860s and early 1870s, the 13th, 14th and 15th amendments respectively abolished slavery, guaranteed African Americans citizenship and voting rights. The 1866 Civil Rights Act helped to ensure property rights for African Americans. However, in 1896, the Plessy v. Ferguson Supreme Court Case justified segregation, declaring that African Americans could be “separate but equal,” spurring the rise of prejudicial and racist Jim Crow laws. <BR><BR>Started by Lyndon Johnson’s Executive Order 11246, affirmative action was conceived to provide equal advantages to all peoples, and to address past governmental injustices by providing support for groups that have been historically discriminated against. Many people would argue that it is our government’s prime responsibility to correct inequities and to create a more just society. <BR><BR>Many take the view that affirmative action is more of a patch than a cure-all. Opponents of affirmative action argue that affirmative action shares the same purpose as the concept of slavery reparations: it punishes the majority for the misdeeds of earlier generations. Further, while affirmative action may seem to make society more egalitarian, its critics argue that the policies are anti-meritocratic and are, actually, a manifestation of “reverse-racism.” <BR><BR>The affirmative action debate lends itself to some important questions, such as: Does the government have a responsibility to correct social inequities? Does affirmative action accomplish its objective of creating a more just society, or is it a manifestation of “reverse-racism”?



Article Disclaimer: OpineTree encourages debate on today’s most controversial political topics, including abortion, affirmative action, cloning, the death penalty, euthanasia, gay marriage, gun control, health care, social security, stem cells, as well as other debate topics. Go to <A href="http://www.opinetree.com/affirmativeaction.html" target=_blank>http://www.opinetree.com/affirmativeaction.html</A> to join the affirmative action debate.